Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Emanuel Mansbach et al., as Executors of Jacob New, Deceased, et al., Appellants and Respondents, v. Florence New et al., Respondents, and Charlotte R. Freeman, Respondent and Appellant, 1902 — 170 N.Y. 585 · caselaw · US
General
Emanuel Mansbach et al., as Executors of Jacob New, Deceased, et al., Appellants and Respondents, v. Florence New et al., Respondents, and Charlotte R. Freeman, Respondent and Appellant
170 N.Y. 585·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Emanuel Mansbach et al., as Executors of Jacob New, Deceased, et al., Appellants and Respondents, v. Florence New et al., Respondents, and Charlotte R. Freeman, Respondent and Appellant.
Mansbach v. New, 58 App. Div. 191, affirmed.
(Argued February 24, 1902;
decided March 7, 1902.)
Cross-appeals from a judgment of the' Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 15, 1901, which modified, and affirmed as modified, a judgment of Special Term construing the will of Jacob New deceased.
Sol M. St/rooolc for plaintiffs, appellants and respondents.
David Sandler and Henry Gottgetreu for Charlotte R. Freeman, respondent and appellant.
Drnid S. Gahn, guardian ad litem, for defendants, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs to parties appearing and filing briefs in this court, on opinion of Ingraham, J., below.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Bartlett', Haight, Martin, Yann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.