General
The Ovington Brothers Company, Appellant, v. Cornelia M. Henshaw, Individually and as Executrix, etc., of Sarah Gracie, Deceased, Respondent
115 A.D. 886·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Ovington Brothers Company, Appellant, v. Cornelia M. Henshaw, Individually and as Executrix, etc., of Sarah Gracie, Deceased, Respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the opinion of Gaynor, J., at Special Term. (Reported in 47 Misc. Rep. 167.) Hirschberg, P. J., Woodward and Miller, JJ., concurred; Jenks and Hooker, JJ., dissented.