General
John Roney et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. H. J. Van Ness
231 U.S. 737·Supreme Court of the United States·1913
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 688.
John Roney et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. H. J. Van Ness.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of California.
Motion to dismiss submitted October 27, 1913.
Decided November 3, 1913.
Mr. A. 'E. Bolton for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Theodore A. Bell for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Revised Statutes, § 1008; Allen v. Southern Pacific R. R. Co., 173 U. S. 479, 484; Aspen Min. & Smelting Co. v. Billings, 150 U. S. 31, 36; Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U. S. 567.