General
Music Center S.N.C. Di Luciano Pisoni & C., Lucien S.N.C. Di Danilo Pisoni & C., and Enzo Pizzi, Inc., plaintiffs v. United States, et al., defendant, and Prestini Musical Instruments Corp., defendant-intervenor
17 Ct. Int'l Trade 1266·United States Court of International Trade·1993
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Music Center S.N.C. Di Luciano Pisoni & C., Lucien S.N.C. Di Danilo Pisoni & C., and Enzo Pizzi, Inc., plaintiffs v. United States, et al., defendant, and Prestini Musical Instruments Corp., defendant-intervenor
Court No. 93-08-00430
(Dated December 2, 1993)
[MAJORITY — Restani, Judge:]
JUDGMENT
Restani, Judge:
This case having been submitted for decision and the Court, after deliberation, having rendered a decision therein; now, in conformity with that decision,
It is hereby ordered: that this action is dismissed as premature. The court has received no evidence to indicate Commerce is not investigating properly the APO violation changes alleged by plaintiff.