General
In the Matter of the Application of James J. Reardon, Petitioner, for a Peremptory Mandamus Order against Charles S. Colden, County Judge of Queens County, and Charles P. Sullivan, District Attorney of Queens County, New York, Respondents
246 A.D. 750·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1935·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of James J. Reardon, Petitioner, for a Peremptory Mandamus Order against Charles S. Colden, County Judge of Queens County, and Charles P. Sullivan, District Attorney of Queens County, New York, Respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Motion for a peremptory mandamus order denied as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion. Present — Young, Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ.