Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Flight Engineers' International Association, AFL-CIO, CAL Chapter, v. Continental Air Lines, Inc., et al., 1962 — 369 U.S. 871 · caselaw · US
General
Flight Engineers' International Association, AFL-CIO, CAL Chapter, v. Continental Air Lines, Inc., et al.
369 U.S. 871·Supreme Court of the United States·1962
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 820.
Flight Engineers’ International Association, AFL-CIO, CAL Chapter, v. Continental Air Lines, Inc., et al.
I. J. Gromfine, Herman Sternstein and Charles K. Hack-ler for petitioner.
Patrick M. Westfeldt and William E. Murane for Continental Air Lines, Inc., and Samuel J. Cohen for Air Line Pilots Association, International, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.