General
W. N. Shewalter, Administrator of Robert Shewalter, Deceased, Plaintiff in Error, v. Carolina, Clinchfield & Ohio Railway
239 U.S. 630·Supreme Court of the United States·1915
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 60.
W. N. Shewalter, Administrator of Robert Shewalter, Deceased, Plaintiff in Error, v. Carolina, Clinchfield & Ohio Railway.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Tennessee.
Argued November 8, 1915.
Decided November 15, 1915.
Mr. Robert Burrow and Mr. Isaac Harr for the plaintiff in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed, with costs, upon the authority of (1) Michigan Central Railroad v. Vreeland, 227 U. S. 59; American Railroad of Porto Rico v. Didricksen, 227 U. S. 145; Gulf, Colorado &c. Ry. v. McGinnis, 228 U. S. 173; Garrett v. Louisville & Nashville R. R., 235 U. S, 308; St. Louis & Iron Mountain Ry. v. Craft, 237 U. S. 648; Kansas City Southern Ry. v. Leslie, 238 U. S. 599; (2) Barron v. Baltimore, 7 Peters, 243; Jack v. Kansas, 199 U. S. 372, 379-380; Brown v. New Jersey, 175 U. S; 172; Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U. S. 78, 93.
Mr. J. Norment Powell and Mr. John W. Price for the defendant in error.