Contracts · MBE-tested
Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees, AFL-CIO, et al. v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.; United States v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.; and Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. United States
382 U.S. 1008·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 750.
No. 782.
No. 783.
Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees, AFL-CIO, et al. v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.; United States v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.; and Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. United States.
Lester P. Schoene, Neal Rutledge and Allan Milledge for petitioners in No. 750.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Douglas and David L. Rose for the United States in No. 782.
William B. Devaney and George B. Mickum III for petitioner in No. 783.
Solicitor General Marshall for the United States in No. 783.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted. The cases are consolidated and a total of two hours is allotted for oral argument. The United States is to open the argument and direct itself first to issues raised in No. 782.
Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.
Reported below: 348 F. 2d 682.