Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Federal Trade Commission v. Consolidated Foods Corp., 1964 — 379 U.S. 912 · caselaw · US
General
Federal Trade Commission v. Consolidated Foods Corp.
379 U.S. 912·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 422.
Federal Trade Commission v. Consolidated Foods Corp.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant .Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel and James Mel. Henderson for petitioner. Anderson A, Owen and Daniel Walker for respondent. Bruce Griswold for Trabón Engineering Corp. et al., as amici curiae, in support of the petition.
[MAJORITY]
Motion of Trabón Engineering Corp. et al. for leave to file a brief, as amici curiae, granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the. Seventh Circuit granted.