Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John H. Wilson, Respondent, v. Fred W. Webber and Francis N. Trevor, Appellants, Impleaded with Others, 1898 — 157 N.Y. 693 · caselaw · US
General
John H. Wilson, Respondent, v. Fred W. Webber and Francis N. Trevor, Appellants, Impleaded with Others
157 N.Y. 693·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John H. Wilson, Respondent, v. Fred W. Webber and Francis N. Trevor, Appellants, Impleaded with Others.
Wilson v. Whitmore, 92 Hun, 466, affirmed.
(Argued October 17, 1898;
decided November 22, 1898.)
Appeal from an order of the -late General Term of the Supreme Court in the'fifth judicial department, entered in December, 1895, sustaining plaintiff’s exceptions to a dismissal of the complaint by the trial court,'ordered to heard in the first instance at General Term, and granting a new trial.
Ecl/ward O. Hart for appellants.
William H Vioary for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for plaintiff on the stipulation, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur.