Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
James Hedges, Respondent, v. William H. Payne, Impleaded, etc., Appellant, 1895 — 146 N.Y. 397 · caselaw · US
General
James Hedges, Respondent, v. William H. Payne, Impleaded, etc., Appellant
146 N.Y. 397·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James Hedges, Respondent, v. William H. Payne, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.
(Argued May 20, 1895;
decided June 4, 1895.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme-Court in the first judicial department, made February 4,1895,,' which reversed an order of Special- Term granting a supersedeas and denied a motion by the defendant, William H. Payne, to be relieved from imprisonment under an order of" arrest obtained by the plaintiff and from arrest under any execution issued in the above-entitled action.
■ Arthur H. Smith for appellant.
Henry E. Howland for respondent.
Reported below, 85 Hun, 377,
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur.
Order affirmed.