Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
ANGELUS BUILDING & INVESTMENT COMPANY, a Corporation, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent, 1932 — 57 F.2d 133 · caselaw · US
Corporations
ANGELUS BUILDING & INVESTMENT COMPANY, a Corporation, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
57 F.2d 133·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ANGELUS BUILDING & INVESTMENT COMPANY, a Corporation, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
No. 6580.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 21, 1932.
George Bouchard and Joseph D. Brady, both of Los Angelos, Cal., for appellant.
G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key and John G. llemy, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., for respondent.
Before WILBDR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges, and JAMES, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — JAMES, District Judge.]
JAMES, District Judge.
The petition for review of tho decision of the Board of Tax Appeals, as made in the case under the above number, involves tho same questions as were considered in ease No. 6579 (C. C. A.) 57 E.(2d) 130, the only difference being that the tax assessed referred to the year 1.923, whereas, in case No. 6579, the year involved was 1922. The parties stipulated that judgment in this ease should follow the decision in case No. 6579.
Tho order of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed.