Corporations
SAKS & CO. v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
263 F. 1020·United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia·1920
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SAKS & CO. v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. *
(Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.
Submitted December 2, 1919.
Decided March 1, 1920.)
No. 3268.
Appeal from Supreme Court of the District of Columbia.
Action by the District of Columbia against Saks & Co. From a judgment" for the District of Columbia, defendant appeals.
Reversed and remanded.
M. D. Rosenberg and E. Hilton Jackson, both of Washington, D. C., for appellant.
O. H. Syme, Corp. Counsel, and F. H. Stephens, Asst. Corp. Counsel, both of Washington, D. O., for the District of Columbia.
[MAJORITY — ROBB, Associate Justice.]
ROBB, Associate Justice.
As the facts here do not differ materially from those in R. P. Andrews Paper Co., a Corporation, v. District of Columbia, 49 App. D. C.-, 263 Fed. 1017, just decided by this court, our ruling must be the-same as in that case. The judgment, therefore, is reversed and case remanded, for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded.
SMYTH, Chief Justice, dissents.