Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Timothy Healy, Appellant, v. Samuel W. Backus, Commissioner, etc., 1916 — 241 U.S. 655 · caselaw · US
General
Timothy Healy, Appellant, v. Samuel W. Backus, Commissioner, etc.
241 U.S. 655·Supreme Court of the United States·1916
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 687.
Timothy Healy, Appellant, v. Samuel W. Backus, Commissioner, etc.
Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Motion to dismiss and petition for writ of certiorari submitted June 5, 1916.
Decided June 12, 1916.
Mr. Marshall B. Woodworth for the appellant. The Attorney General and The Solicitor General for the appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Lau Ow Bew v. United States, 144 U. S. 47, 58; Whitney v. Dick, 202 U. S. 132, 135; McClellan v. Garland, 217 U. S. 268, 278. Petition for writ of certiorari herein granted.