Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Kharaiti Ram Samras v. United States; Carleton Screw Products Co. v. Fleming, Administrator, 1942 — 317 U.S. 634 · caselaw · US
General
Kharaiti Ram Samras v. United States; Carleton Screw Products Co. v. Fleming, Administrator
317 U.S. 634·Supreme Court of the United States·1942
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 130.
Kharaiti Ram Samras v. United States. Carleton Screw Products Co. v. Fleming, Administrator.
No. 267.
October 12, 1942.
Mr. D. B. Spagnoli for petitioner in No. 130. Mr. Josiah E. Brill for petitioner in No. 267. Solicitor General Fahy for respondent in No. 130, and Mr. Warner W. Gardner was with him on the brief for respondent in No. 267.
[MAJORITY]
The petitions for writs of certiorari in these cases are denied for the reason that applications therefor were not made within the time provided by law. § 8 (a), Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 940), 28 U. S. C., § 350.