Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of Joseph H. Adolph et al., Respondents, to Lay Out a Highway in the Town of Highlands. Esek C. Carpenter, Appellant, 1906 — 186 N.Y. 547 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Application of Joseph H. Adolph et al., Respondents, to Lay Out a Highway in the Town of Highlands. Esek C. Carpenter, Appellant
186 N.Y. 547·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of Joseph H. Adolph et al., Respondents, to Lay Out a Highway in the Town of Highlands. Esek C. Carpenter, Appellant.
Matter of Adolph, 103 App. Div. 371, affirmed.
(Argued October 4, 1906;
decided October 23, 1906.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered April 10, 1905, which affirmed an order of the Orange County Court directing the laying out and opening of a certain highway in the town of Highlands.
Robert H. Barnett for appellant.
A. H. F. Seeger for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Werner and Chase, JJ. Not sitting: Willard Bartlett, JJ.