Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Hartford Electric Light Co. v. Federal Power Commission, 1943 — 319 U.S. 741 · caselaw · US
General
Hartford Electric Light Co. v. Federal Power Commission
319 U.S. 741·Supreme Court of the United States·1943
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 831.
Hartford Electric Light Co. v. Federal Power Commission.
May 3, 1943.
Messrs. E. Barrett Prettyman and Austin D. Barney for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Shea, and Messrs. Charles V. Shannon and Howard E. Wahrenbrock for respondent. Messrs. John E. Benton and Frank B. Warren filed a brief on behalf of the National Association of Railroad and Utilities Commissioners, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.