Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Blue et al. v. United States; Clark et al. v. United States; and Pardee et al. v. United States, 1944 — 322 U.S. 736 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Blue et al. v. United States; Clark et al. v. United States; and Pardee et al. v. United States
322 U.S. 736·Supreme Court of the United States·1944
Mr. Justice Murphy is of opinion that the petition should be granted. · Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 789.
No. 790.
Blue et al. v. United States; Clark et al. v. United States; and Pardee et al. v. United States.
No. 791.
May 1, 1944.
Messrs. Matthew L. Bigger, Frank Wiedemann, and Carrington T. Marshall for petitioners.
Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Tom C. Clark, Messrs. Robert S. Erdahl and Robert L. Stern, and Miss Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
[MAJORITY]
The petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is denied.
Mr. Justice Murphy is of opinion that the petition should be granted.
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Reported below: 138 P. 2d 351.