Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Brennan et al. v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Co. et al.; and Switchmen's Union of North America et al. v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Co. et al., 1952 — 343 U.S. 977 · caselaw · US
General
Brennan et al. v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Co. et al.; and Switchmen's Union of North America et al. v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Co. et al.
343 U.S. 977·Supreme Court of the United States·1952
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 720.
No. 728.
Brennan et al. v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Co. et al.; and Switchmen's Union of North America et al. v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Co. et al.
Thomas J. McKenna for petitioners in No. 720 and Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, respondent in No. 728. Harold C. Heiss for petitioners in No. 728. Rowland L. Davis, Jr. for the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Co., respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Court of Appeals of New York. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 303 N. Y. 411, 103 N. E. 2d 532.