Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Town of Palatine et al., Appellants, v. The Canajoharie Water Supply Company et al., Respondents, 1906 — 184 N.Y. 582 · caselaw · US
General
Town of Palatine et al., Appellants, v. The Canajoharie Water Supply Company et al., Respondents
184 N.Y. 582·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Town of Palatine et al., Appellants, v. The Canajoharie Water Supply Company et al., Respondents.
Town of Palatine v. Canajoharie Water Supply Co., 90 App. Div. 548, affirmed.
(Argued March 8, 1906;
decided March 27, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered March 18, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term.
Henry Y. Borst and Charles W. Wheeler for appellants.
Andrew J. Nellis and B. G. Fox for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, with leave to appellants to apply to the Supreme Court for such relief as they may be advised; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Haight, Yann, Willard Bartlett and Hisoook, JJ. Absent: Werner, J.