General
In the Matter of the Application of The Pierce, Butler & Pierce Manufacturing Company for a Peremptory Writ of Mandamus, v. Frederick W. Bleckwenn, City Treasurer of Long Island City
131 N.Y. 570·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of The Pierce, Butler & Pierce Manufacturing Company for a Peremptory Writ of Mandamus, v. Frederick W. Bleckwenn, City Treasurer of Long Island City.
(Argued January 20, 1892;
decided February 2, 1892.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, made December 14, 1891, which reversed an order of Special Term denying a writ of mandamus herein.
A. T. Payne for appellant.
George W. Stephens for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Maynard, J., taking no part.
Order affirmed.