General
THE GOLDEN RULE
278 F. 1021·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1922
Before ROGERS, MANTON, and MAYER, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
THE GOLDEN RULE.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
January 18, 1922.)
No. 148.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Libel by Katherine Dunnigan and others against the steam tug Golden Rule, of which the Carroll Towing Lino, Incorporated, was claimant, in which suit the Associated Operating Company was impleaded under the fifty-ninth rule. From a decree dismissing the libel and petition the libellants appeal.
Affirmed.
Macklin, Brown & Purdy, of New York City (Pierre M. Brown, of New York City of counsel), Cor appellants.
Burlingham, Yeeder, Masten & Fearey, of New York City (Chauncey I. Clark and Ralph W. Brown, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Before ROGERS, MANTON, and MAYER, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree affirmed.