General
Wilhelm Weiland, Respondent, v. Etta Forgotston and Others, Defendants; Adelaide R. Schomberg, Appellant
44 A.D. 633·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Wilhelm Weiland, Respondent, v. Etta Forgotston and Others, Defendants; Adelaide R. Schomberg, Appellant.
Judgment affirmed, with costs, with leave to the defendant to withdraw demurrer and answer in twenty days, on payment of costs in this court and in the court below.—Appeal from an interlocutory judgment overruling a demurrer to the complaint.
[MAJORITY — Patterson, J.:]
Patterson, J.:
For the reasons stated in the opinion in the case of Weiland v. Forgotston, decided herewith (ante, p. 54), the interlocutory judgment must be affirmed, with costs, but with permission to the demurring defendant, on the payment of costs in this court and in the court below, to withdraw the demurrer and answer within twenty days from the entry of the order of affirmance to be made hereon. Van Brunt, P. J., Rumsey and O’Brien, JJ., concurred.