Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Tony ALEXANDER, Appellant, v. A. C. ADERHOLD, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia, Appellee, 1933 — 67 F.2d 983 · caselaw · US
General
Tony ALEXANDER, Appellant, v. A. C. ADERHOLD, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia, Appellee
67 F.2d 983·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Tony ALEXANDER, Appellant, v. A. C. ADERHOLD, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia, Appellee.
No. 6965.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Oct. 13, 1933.
Tony Alexander, in pro. per.
H. T. Nichols, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.
Before BRYAN, SIBLEY, and..HUTCHESON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
On the authority of United States v. Barnow, 239 U. S. 74, 36 S. Ct. 19, 60 L. Ed. 155, and Lamar v. United States, 241 U. S. 103, 36 S. Ct. 535, 60 L. Ed. 912, the judgment is' affirmed.