General
UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY CO. v. LOEWENSTEIN
178 F. 1007·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1910
Before GOFF and PRITCHARD, Circuit Judges, and BOYD, District Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY CO. v. LOEWENSTEIN.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
May 21, 1910.)
No. 959.
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard H. Bland (Bartiett. Olaggett & Bland, on the brief), for plaintiff in error. W. Harry Holmes (Bruner R. Anderson, on the brief), for defendant in error.
Before GOFF and PRITCHARD, Circuit Judges, and BOYD, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
We have carefully considered the assignments of error herein, and in view of the circumstances surrounding this case, as well as the stafute in pursuance of which this proceeding was instituted, we are of opinion that substantial justice has been done, and that the learned jiidge who heard this ease was hot in error. Therefore the judgment of the lower court should be affirmed.