Admiralty
Stockton Port District v. Federal Maritime Commission et al.
386 U.S. 1031·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1064.
Stockton Port District v. Federal Maritime Commission et al.
J. Richard Townsend for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Irwin A. Seibel and Robert N. Katz for respondent Federal Maritime Commission et al.; Edward D. Ransom for respondent Pacific Westbound Conference; and Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, and Miriam E. Wolff, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent State of California.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.