Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Katherine Schad et al., as Administrators of Henry Schad, Deceased, Respondents, v. The Security Mutual Life Association of Binghamton, N. Y., Appellant, 1898 — 155 N.Y. 640 · caselaw · US
Securities
Katherine Schad et al., as Administrators of Henry Schad, Deceased, Respondents, v. The Security Mutual Life Association of Binghamton, N. Y., Appellant
155 N.Y. 640·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Katherine Schad et al., as Administrators of Henry Schad, Deceased, Respondents, v. The Security Mutual Life Association of Binghamton, N. Y., Appellant.
Sohad v. Security Mat. L. Assn., 11 App. Div. 487, affirmed.
(Argued January 26, 1898;
decided March 1, 1898.)
Appeal from a judgment and order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered December 16, 1896, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial made on a case and exceptions.
Frederick W. Jenkims for appellant.
Robert B. Richards for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.