Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Ah Sou, Appellant, v. The United States, 1905 — 200 U.S. 611 · caselaw · US
General
Ah Sou, Appellant, v. The United States
200 U.S. 611·Supreme Court of the United States·1905
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 339.
Ah Sou, Appellant, v. The United States.
Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted December 11, 1905.
Decided December 18, 1905.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Appeal from the -United States Circuit Court, of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. 132 Fed. Rep, 878; 138 Fed. Rep. 775; Barry v. Mercein, 5 How. 103, 120; Kurtz v. Moffitt, 115 U. S. 487; Lau Ow Bew v. United States, 144 U. S. 47, 58; Western Union Telegraph Company v. Ann Arbor Railroad Company, 178 U. S. 239; Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89; Fong Yue Ting v. United States, 149 U. S. 698, 730; Chin Bak Kan v. United States, 186 U. S. 193; Tom Hong v. United States, 193 U. S. 517; Turner v. Williams, 194 U. S. 279.
Mr. John M. Thurston for appellant. The Attorney General and The Solicitor General for appellee.