Corporations
Nicholas Charytz, Appellant, v. Frances Kasinski, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Bronislaw Rogowski et al., Third-Party Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents; Eden Avenue Development Corporation, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent
282 A.D. 891·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1953·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nicholas Charytz, Appellant, v. Frances Kasinski, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Bronislaw Rogowski et al., Third-Party Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents; Eden Avenue Development Corporation, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.—
[MAJORITY]
In an action in ejectment, plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of the defendant Kasinski, dismissing the complaint on the opening of his counsel. Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. In our opinion, on the record presented, it was error to dismiss the complaint. (Bunkel V. City of New York, 282 App. Div. 173; Hoffman House v. Foote, 172 H. Y. 348.) Holán, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, MacCrate and Beldock, JJ., concur.