Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George PHILP, Appellant, v. Richard L. NORTH and J. Grover Kelly, Co-receivers of the ELMER COMPANY, Ltd., Appellees, 1934 — 72 F.2d 1018 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
George PHILP, Appellant, v. Richard L. NORTH and J. Grover Kelly, Co-receivers of the ELMER COMPANY, Ltd., Appellees
72 F.2d 1018·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George PHILP, Appellant, v. Richard L. NORTH and J. Grover Kelly, Co-receivers of the ELMER COMPANY, Ltd., Appellees.
No. 7411.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Oct. 18, 1934.
Melville R. Adams, of Venice, Cal., for appellant.
Walter J. Little and W. Eugene Craven, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.
Before WILBUR, SAWTELLE, and, GARRECHT, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of transcript and briefs filed, and after oral argument on behalf of appellees, ordered decree of District Court affirmed, that decree be filed and entered accordingly, and mandate issued as provided in rule 32.