McREYNOLDS v. STATE

6 So.2d 602 McREYNOLDS v. STATE. 2 Div. 696. Court of Appeals of Alabama. March 3, 1942. Godbold & Godbold, of Camden, for appellant. Thos. S. Lawson, Atty, Gen., and Wm. N. McQueen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State. [MAJORITY — RICE, Judge.] RICE, Judge. Appellant was convicted of the offense of grand larceny. We see nothing to discuss. The record is regular in all respects. There were no exceptions reserved on the trial — or rulings by which an exception is presumed. Appellant, after the trial, procured attorneys — 'two good ones — who have filed a brief here. But their principal — in effect, sole — contention is that, appellant ought'to have a new trial because he had no counsel on his trial below. He asked for no such counsel, and cannot now complain. The judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.