General
Arthur J. Axtell, Respondent, v. Daniel J. Waples et al., as Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Palm Grill, Appellants
283 A.D. 986·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1954·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(May 21, 1954.)
Arthur J. Axtell, Respondent, v. Daniel J. Waples et al., as Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Palm Grill, Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Motion to dismiss appeal granted, by default, without costs. Present — Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Imrie, JJ.