General
In the Matter of the Application of Frank B. Schmidt, Respondent, for a Peremptory Order of Mandamus against The Board of Supervisors of the County of Monroe, Appellant, and Ray F. Fowler, as District Attorney, Defendant
245 A.D. 805·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1935·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of Frank B. Schmidt, Respondent, for a Peremptory Order of Mandamus against The Board of Supervisors of the County of Monroe, Appellant, and Ray F. Fowler, as District Attorney, Defendant.
[MAJORITY]
Motion for a reargument denied, with ten dollars costs; motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.