Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Myer Hellman et al., Respondents, v. The Forty-second Street and Grand Street Ferry Railroad Company, Appellant, 1895 — 148 N.Y. 727 · caselaw · US
General
Myer Hellman et al., Respondents, v. The Forty-second Street and Grand Street Ferry Railroad Company, Appellant
148 N.Y. 727·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Myer Hellman et al., Respondents, v. The Forty-second Street and Grand Street Ferry Railroad Company, Appellant.
Reported below, 74 Hun, 529.
(Argued December 3, 1895;
decided December 19, 1895.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made December 15, 1893, which overruled defendant’s exceptions, ordered to be heard in the first instance at General Term, denied a motion for a new trial and ordered judgment for the plaintiff upon a verdict directed by, the court.
Freling II. Smith for appellant.
George lloadly for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on authority of 5th Avenue Bank v. 42nd St. & Grand St. Ferry R. R. (137 N. Y. 231).
All concur.