Administrative

WERNER, HARRIS & BUCK, Bondholders' Committee, Intervener, Appellant, v. EQUITABLE TRUST CO. et al., Appellees

33 F.2d 1023·United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·1929

Before COTTERAL, PHILLIPS, and MeDERMOTT, Circuit Judges.

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

WERNER, HARRIS & BUCK, Bondholders’ Committee, Intervener, Appellant, v. EQUITABLE TRUST CO. et al., Appellees. Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. June 6, 1929. No. 50. Chas. Battelle and C. E. Herring, both of Omaha, Neb., for appellees. Before COTTERAL, PHILLIPS, and MeDERMOTT, Circuit Judges. [MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.] PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss the appeal herein on the ground of absence of necessary parties appellee is overruled without prejudice on authority of Lockman v. Lang (C. C. A. 8) 132 F. 1, 3-5; Gray v. Grand Forks Mercantile Co. (C. C. A. 8), 138 F. 344, 346; and on the ground of the lack of capacity of the appellant to prosecute the appeal is overruled with prejudice on the authority of International News Service v. Associated Press, 248 U. S. 215, 233, 39 S. Ct. 68, 63 L. Ed. 211, 2 A. L. R. 293. Let an order be entered accordingly.