Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Valentina Chaves de Padilla, 1912 — 226 U.S. 618 · caselaw · US
General
The Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Valentina Chaves de Padilla
226 U.S. 618·Supreme Court of the United States·1912
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 547.
The Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Valentina Chaves de Padilla.
In error to the Supreme Court of the Territory of New Mexico.
November 4, 1912.
Mr. Robert Dunlap for the plaintiffs in error.
No appearance for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY]
Dismissed with costs, per stipulation, and cause remanded to the Supreme Court of the State of New Mexico.