Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Johanna Kalish et al., as Executors of Joseph Kalish, Deceased, Appellants, v. Luke Higgins et al., Respondents. (Actions 1 and 2.), 1903 — 175 N.Y. 495 · caselaw · US
General
Johanna Kalish et al., as Executors of Joseph Kalish, Deceased, Appellants, v. Luke Higgins et al., Respondents. (Actions 1 and 2.)
175 N.Y. 495·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Johanna Kalish et al., as Executors of Joseph Kalish, Deceased, Appellants, v. Luke Higgins et al., Respondents. (Actions 1 and 2.)
Kalish v. Higgins, 70 App. Div. 192, 613, affirmed.
(Argued May 20, 1903;
decided June 2, 1903.)
Appeals from orders of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 8, 1902, reversing judgments in favor of plaintiffs entered upon decisions of the court on trial at Special Term and granting new trials.
Edward W. S. Johnston and Hawkins c& Belafield for appellants.
M. J. Horan for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Orders affirmed and judgments absolute ordered for defendants on the stipulations, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Martin, Cullen and Werner, JJ.