Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Metro Broadcasting Co., Inc. v. Secretary of the Treasury of Puerto Rico; Stewart v. Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland; Payne v. California; Dixon v. United States; Thiess v. Franklin Square Hospital, Inc., et al.; Mooney v. Georgia; Pitchford v. Supreme Court of Arkansas; Air Freight Haulage Co., Inc. v. Ryd-Air, Inc., et al.; Countryman v. Texas et al.; Rivera v. Cruz et al.; Ernest v. United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; Shuffman, Executrix v. Hartford Textile Corp. et al.; Sheedy v. United States; Ernest v. Sirica, U. S. District Judge, et al.; Bridger v. Arkansas; Sayles v. Shuker, Judge, et al.; Sanders et al. v. Hankins et al.; Jackson v. Florida; Salvatore v. Florida; Weaver v. United States; Willis v. Georgia; Postell v. Texas; Gaskins v. Ashe, Sheriff, et al.; W. D. v. Illinois, 1979 — 444 U.S. 975 · caselaw · US