Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Roma et al. v. Municipal Civil Service Commission, City of New York, et al., 1965 — 380 U.S. 963 · caselaw · US
General
Roma et al. v. Municipal Civil Service Commission, City of New York, et al.
380 U.S. 963·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 913.
Roma et al. v. Municipal Civil Service Commission, City of New York, et al.
John H. Mariano for petitioners. Leo A. Larkin and Seymour B. Quel for Municipal Civil Service Commission et al.; Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, and Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, for State Civil Service Commission; and Helen R. Cassidy and James P. McMahon for New York City Transit Authority, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.