Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Respublica versus Mitchell, 1788 — 2 U.S. 101 · caselaw · US
General
Respublica versus Mitchell
2 U.S. 1012 Dall. 101·Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·1788·PA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Respublica versus Mitchell.
[MAJORITY]
THIS was an appeal from the settlement of Mitchell's account by the Comptroller General; and the cause had been referred, by consent. The referrees reported a fum due to Mitchell; but had omitted to allow him interest; which, being stated to the Court.
It was resolved, That the State was liable to pay interest, as well as individuals; and that the Court would add it, under the circumstances of the case, although the referrees had not expressly, given it in their report.