Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
OHIO OIL COMPANY v. INDIANA, 1900 — 177 U.S. 213 · caselaw · US
General
OHIO OIL COMPANY v. INDIANA
177 U.S. 21344 L. Ed. 740·Supreme Court of the United States·1900
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
OHIO OIL COMPANY v. INDIANA
(NO. 3).
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF INDIANA.
No. 85.
Argued December 18, 19, 1899.
Decided April 9, 1900.
The judgment below in this case is affirmed for the reasons given in Ohio Oil Company v. Indiana, No. 1, ante, page 190.
This case was argued with No. 84, ante, 190, and by the same counsel.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Justice White]
Mr. Justice White
delivered the opinion of the court.
The Supreme Court of the State of Indiana affirmed a judgment of the trial court, awarding the sum of certain penalties incurred by violating a statute of the State of Indiana which came under our review in case No. 84, this day disposed of. The opinion in that case is conclusive of every question here arising, and for the reasons given in case No. 84, the judgment is
Affirmed.