Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Felix J. Gallagher, Respondent, v. William C. Bryant et al., Appellants, 1900 — 162 N.Y. 662 · caselaw · US
General
Felix J. Gallagher, Respondent, v. William C. Bryant et al., Appellants
162 N.Y. 662·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Concur: Parker, Oh. J., Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Vann and Landon, JJ. Dissenting: O’Brien, J.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Felix J. Gallagher, Respondent, v. William C. Bryant et al., Appellants.
Gallagher v. Bryant, 44 App. Div. 527, affirmed.
(Argued April 17, 1900;
decided May 1, 1900.)
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, made November 21, 1899, reversing an interlocutory judgment of Special Term sustaining a demurrer to the. complaint.
The question certified was as follows: “ Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action ? ”
George H. Fisher for appellants.
Charles Lex Brooke for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative on opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Oh. J., Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Vann and Landon, JJ. Dissenting: O’Brien, J.