Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Texas v. New Mexico, 1981 — 454 U.S. 1076 · caselaw · US
General
Texas v. New Mexico
454 U.S. 1076·Supreme Court of the United States·1981
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 65,
Orig.
Texas v. New Mexico.
[MAJORITY]
It is ordered that the order heretofore entered on November 11, 1975, which appeared in 423 U. S. 942, is amended to read as follows: It is ordered that the Honorable Jean Sala Breitenstein, Senior Judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, be appointed Special Master in this case with authority to fix the time and conditions for the filing of additional pleadings and to direct subsequent proceedings, and with authority to summon witnesses, issue subpoenas, and take such evidence as may be introduced and such as he may deem it necessary to call for. The Master is directed to submit such reports as he may deem appropriate.
The Master shall be allowed his actual expenses. The allowances to him, the compensation paid to his legal, technical, stenographic, and clerical assistants, the cost of printing his report, and all other proper expenses shall be charged against and be borne by the parties in such proportion as the Court may hereafter direct.
It is further ordered that if the position of Special Master in this case becomes vacant during a recess of the Court, The Chief Justice shall have authority to make a new designation which shall have the same effect as if originally made by the Court.
The motion of the United States for leave to intervene is referred to the Special Master. [For earlier decision herein, see, e. g., 446 U. S. 540.]