Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Patrick Connors, as Administrator of the Estate of William Connors, Deceased, Respondent, v. The Great Northern Elevator Company, Appellant, 1904 — 180 N.Y. 509 · caselaw · US
General
Patrick Connors, as Administrator of the Estate of William Connors, Deceased, Respondent, v. The Great Northern Elevator Company, Appellant
180 N.Y. 509·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Patrick Connors, as Administrator of the Estate of William Connors, Deceased, Respondent, v. The Great Northern Elevator Company, Appellant.
Connors v. Great Northern Memtor Co., 90 App. Div. 811, affirmed.
(Argued November 28, 1904;
decided December 13, 1904.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered January 14, 1904, reversing a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term and granting a new trial.
Frank Gibbons and Harry A. Talbot for appellant.
Daniel J. Hanley for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for plaintiff .on the stipulation, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Vann, JJ. Not voting: Gray, J.