Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The City of Omaha et al., Appellants, v. The Omaha Water Company, 1907 — 207 U.S. 584 · caselaw · US
General
The City of Omaha et al., Appellants, v. The Omaha Water Company
207 U.S. 584·Supreme Court of the United States·1907
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 88.
The City of Omaha et al., Appellants, v. The Omaha Water Company.
Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Argued December 19, 1907.
Decided December 23, 1907.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Appeal dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173; Boom Company v. United States, 202 U. S. 613; California Consolidated Mining Company v. Manley, 203 U. S. 579. Certiorari denied. Chicago and Northwestern Railway Company v. Osborne, 146 U. S. 354; McLish v. Roff, 141 U. S. 661; Forsythe v. Hammond, 166 U. S. 506.
Mr. John L. Webster and Mr. Carl C. Wright for appellants. Mr. Lucius H. Beers, Mr. Howard Mansfield and Mr. R. S. Hall for appellee. .