Contracts · MBE-tested
A. C. WOODMAN, Appellant, v. STEAUA ROMANA SOCIETATE ANONIMA PENTRU INDUSTRIA PETROLEULUI OF BUCHAREST, Appellee
61 F.2d 1047·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
A. C. WOODMAN, Appellant, v. STEAUA RO-MANA SOCIETATE ANONIMA PENTRU INDUSTRIA PETROLEULUI OF BUCHAREST, Appellee.
No. 4904.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Oct. 24, 1932.
For opinion below, see — F. Supp. —.
Wm. Clarke Mason, of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.
T. Henry Walnut, of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
On consideration of the stipulation of the parties herein filed, it is now here ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this court that the decree of the said District Court in this cause be, and the same is hereby, reversed, and the said District Court is hereby directed to enter a decree in favor of the defendant, A. C. Woodman, above named, without costs to either party as against the other.