Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People ex rel. James M. Patterson, Appellant, v. Edward Reed, Respondent, 1894 — 142 N.Y. 630 · caselaw · US
General
The People ex rel. James M. Patterson, Appellant, v. Edward Reed, Respondent
142 N.Y. 630·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People ex rel. James M. Patterson, Appellant, v. Edward Reed, Respondent.
(Argued March 13, 1894;
decided April 10, 1894.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered upon an order made July 2, 1892, which affirmed an order of the county judge of Warren county dismissing a writ of habeas corpus, and remanding the relator to the custody of the defendant.
Louis M. Brown for appellant.
Charles J. Buchancm for respondent.
Beported below, 64 Hun, 453.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur.
Order affirmed.