Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Jerry E. B. Santee et al., as Administrators, etc., Respondents, v. The New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad Company, Appellant, 1890 — 122 N.Y. 638 · caselaw · US
Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
Jerry E. B. Santee et al., as Administrators, etc., Respondents, v. The New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad Company, Appellant
122 N.Y. 638·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Jerry E. B. Santee et al., as Administrators, etc., Respondents, v. The New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Argued June 25, 1890;
decided October 7, 1890.)
Appeal from judgment of the Genera] Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department in favor of plaintiff entered upon an order made October 24,1885, which denied a motion for a new trial and ordered judgment upon verdict.
A. S. Kendall for appellant.
Geo. N. Orcutt for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Parker, J., dissenting, and Bradley, J., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.