Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Michigan-Wisconsin Pipe Line Co. v. Calvert, Comptroller of Public Accounts, et al.; and Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Calvert, Comptroller of Public Accounts, et al., 1953 — 346 U.S. 805 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Michigan-Wisconsin Pipe Line Co. v. Calvert, Comptroller of Public Accounts, et al.; and Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Calvert, Comptroller of Public Accounts, et al.
346 U.S. 805·Supreme Court of the United States·1953
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 199.
No. 201.
Michigan-Wisconsin Pipe Line Co. v. Calvert, Comptroller of Public Accounts, et al.; and Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Calvert, Comptroller of Public Accounts, et al.
D. H. Culton, Everett L. Looney and R. Dean Moorhead for appellants. With them were S. A. L. Morgan in No. 199, and Edward H. Lange and Gene Woodfin in No. 201. John Ben Shep-perd, Attorney General of Texas, and W. V. Geppert and C. K. Richards, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.
[MAJORITY]
Appeals from the Supreme Court of Texas. Further consideration of the motions to dismiss or affirm and of the jurisdiction of this Court in these cases is postponed to the hearing of the cases on the merits.