General
Mego Corp. v. United States
57 Cust. Ct. 295·United States Customs Court·1966
Before Oliver, Nichols, and Watson, Judges
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(C.D. 2792)
Mego Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court, First Division
(Decided October 19, 1966)
Plaintiff not represented by counsel.
J. WilUam DooUttle, Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
Before Oliver, Nichols, and Watson, Judges
[MAJORITY — Nichols, Judge:]
Nichols, Judge:
When this case was called for trial, there was no appearance on behalf of the plaintiff, and defendant moved to dismiss the protest for lack of prosecution.
It appearing from the official papers that the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it is dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
Judgment will be rendered accordingly.